Public check · 4 August 2026
Gemini-generated image
No strong AI signal
The detector found no strong signal of AI generation. That is not evidence that a human made it.
Check your own file
- Raw score
- 0.000
- Detector
- aidetect-v5-image-384-v1
- Media type
- Image
- Checked
- 4 August 2026
- Source
- commons.wikimedia.org
Checked with the detector version shown above. The current routed lane is aidetect-v16-image-384-v1+owenslab+siglip-probe-routed-v11+dualview-orig-v1; these pages predate it. See the current measurements.
The file carries no Content Credentials. Their absence says nothing either way — most cameras and most tools do not add them.
The detector missed this one. The source states that this item is AI-generated, and the detector did not raise a strong signal. Published anyway: a page that only showed the hits would misrepresent how well this works.
What this page does not say.
- It does not say who made this, or with which tool.
- It does not say anyone tried to mislead anyone.
- A low score is the absence of a signal, never evidence that a human made something.
- Video is judged on 15 sampled frames, at least 3 of which must score strongly: 82.6% caught (62.9-93.0%) on 23 videos at 1.4% false warnings. That interval is wide because the set is small. Sampled video says nothing about motion, lip-sync, or the moments between sampled frames. The measurements are published, failures included.
- Nothing here is a decision. If it matters, look at the source, the context and the Content Credentials yourself.
Think this is wrong? Tell us — we recheck and correct.